login
Password reminder
Cardiovascular News
Contact the editor Visit Cardiovascular News Twitter feed Visit Cardiovascular News Facebook page
 

Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation


Wednesday, 25 Jul 2012 16:50
Robert van der Boon
Robert van der Boon

By Robert M A van der Boon

With its 10-year anniversary and exceeding 50,000 implantations worldwide, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven to be a viable and safe treatment strategy for patients with severe aortic stenosis and high operative risk. However, with the prospect of treating younger or less sick patients, a number of vexing issues remain.

The frequent occurrence of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB), high degree atrioventricular block (HDAVB; second [AV2B] and third degree [AV3B]) and subsequent permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) have been demonstrated in several observational studies, especially following the implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve system. The radial force of this self-expandable bioprosthesis, exerted on the surrounding tissue of the left ventricular outflow tract may provoke conduction abnormalities after TAVI. Various patient- and procedure-related factors have been associated with these conduction abnormalities such as depth of implantation and pre-existing conduction defects. Although prior studies focused on assessing the possible predictors of conduction abnormalities, recent data suggest that conduction abnormalities may resolve over time. The possibility that conduction abnormalities may resolve early or late after TAVI puts the clinical implications of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI in a different perspective.

 

Between November 2005 and February 2011, 167 with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis and no previous permanent pacemaker implantation underwent TAVI with the CoreValve system in the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. During the index hospitalisation, 36 patients (21.6%) underwent permanent pacemaker implantation of which the indications were HDAVB in 30 patients, bradycardia in five patients and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (AICD) in one patient. Pacemaker dependency at follow-up was prospectively documented in all patients who underwent a permanent pacemaker implantation during the index hospitalisation by comprehensive pacemaker interrogation (median follow-up of 11.5 months) at the outpatient clinic visit. In case of a paced rhythm, the pacemaker was temporarily switched off or programmed to a slow rate VVI modus to assess underlying electrical activity. Patients were considered pacemaker dependent if a HDAVB or a slow (<30bpm) or absent ventricular escape rhythm was observed. Of the 30 patients who received a pacemaker because of a HDAVB, 11 had a complete resolution of the conduction abnormality whereas five had a partial resolution (first degree atrioventricular block [AV1B] at follow-up) while the remaining 14 patients still had an AV3B and were pacemaker dependent. Overall, 20 out of the 36 patients (55.6%) who received a new pacemaker following TAVI were pacemaker independent at their follow-up visit. Despite being from a single center observational study, with a restrictive use of new permanent pacemaker implantation and the assessment of pacemaker dependency at one single point during follow-up, these findings suggest recovery of high degree conduction abnormalities in a significant number of patients.

 

If true, patients with a transient conduction abnormality should be carefully distinguished from those with a permanent defect. Larger dedicated studies are needed to obtain more information on the true frequency and degree of recovery of the conduction abnormalities, at what time after TAVI it occurs and whether it is permanent or transient. Elucidation of these factors could help in the decision whether a patient with a new conduction abnormality after TAVI should undergo permanent pacemaker implantation. For now, it seems more reasonable to adjust permanent pacemaker algorithms to stimulate intrinsic conduction and ventricular activation. This may require more intense pacemaker follow up and more liberal and patient tailored adjustments.

Robert M A van der Boon is with the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. His mentor is Peter P T de Jaegere




Add New Comment

Most popular


Merit Medical Systems launches the Prelude Snap splittable sheath introducer
Wednesday, 03 Jun 2015
Merit Medical Systems has launched the Prelude Snap splittable sheath introducer, the design of which is based directly on physician feedback. Merit Medical Systems launches the Prelude Snap splittable sheath introducer

Men believe “long working hours” stop women from being interventional cardiologists
Wednesday, 15 Jul 2015
According to a new survey published in EuroIntervention, men state that the long working hours and the need to be on call that is associated with being an interventional cardiologist are the key ... Men believe “long working hours” stop women from being interventional cardiologists

Boston Scientific launches bioresorbable scaffold trial
Monday, 20 Jul 2015
Boston Scientific has initiated a study to evaluate its fully resorbable scaffold technology. FAST (Fully absorbable scaffold feasibility study) is a prospective, single-arm study designed to assess ... Boston Scientific launches bioresorbable scaffold trial

Features


Strut coverage: Optical coherence tomography and new stent technologies
Monday, 20 Jul 2015
Tim Kinnaird explores the risk of stent thrombosis with current technologies, how new technologies may be able to reduce this risk, and how OCT can help to assess this risk. Strut coverage: Optical coherence tomography and new stent technologies

The second generation of drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers may have potential advantages
Monday, 06 Jul 2015
Drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers have theoretical advantages over drug-eluting stents with permanent polymers—even second-generation drug-eluting stents. The second generation of drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymers may have potential advantages

Profiles


Deepak L Bhatt
Tuesday, 09 Jun 2015
Deepak L Bhatt (Executive director of Interventional Cardiovascular Programs, Brigham and Women’s H... Deepak L Bhatt

Flavio Ribichini
Thursday, 05 Mar 2015
Flavio Ribichini speaks to Cardiovascular News about being involved in the first use of primary ... Flavio Ribichini

Cardiac Rhythm News Vascular News Cardiovascular News Interventional News Spinal News NeuroNews
BIBA Medical BIBA MedTech Insights CX Symposium ilegx
Password Reminder

BIBA Medical, 526 Fulham Road, Fulham, London, SW6 5NR.
TEL: +44 (0)20 7736 8788 FAX: +44 (0)20 7736 8283 EMAIL: 
info@bibamedical.com
© BIBA Medical Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 2944429.
VAT registration number 730 6811 50.
Site Map | Terms and Conditions