Password reminder
Cardiovascular News
Contact the editor Visit Cardiovascular News Twitter feed Visit Cardiovascular News Facebook page

Radiation exposure during coronary angiography via transradial or transfemoral approaches: Does operator experience matter?

Wednesday, 25 Jul 2012 16:53
Binita Shah
Binita Shah

By Binita Shah


Cumulative radiation exposure to both patients and operators has become a topic of great interest given the overall increased use of both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular imaging modalities. This is all the more important with the increasing usage of multimodality imaging, including non-invasive (single-photon emission computed tomography, computed tomography angiography) and invasive procedures in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.


The risks of increased radiation exposure, in the short run, include dermatologic burns for patients and, in the long run, increased risk of malignancy for both patients and operators.


At the same time, there is a growing trend to perform invasive coronary procedures utilising the transradial approach due to decreased major bleeding complications and increased patient satisfaction compared with the transfemoral approach. However, there is a learning curve for transradial approach for coronary angiography and intervention, and it is associated with longer procedural and fluoroscopy times. Whether the increased risk of radiation exposure is seen in transradial compared with transfemoral cases when procedures are performed by experienced operators is less clearly defined.


A retrospective analysis of radiation exposure during coronary angiography via transradial versus transfemoral approach performed by experienced operators at the New York University Langone Medical Center was presented on 15 May during an oral abstract session of the 2012 EuroPCR meeting. In a contemporary cohort of 1,696 patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by experienced operators, transradial approach was associated with higher radiation exposure when compared with transfemoral approach. Experienced operators were defined as operators performing more than 75 PCIs per year for at least five years with more than 95% of cases using one type of approach to access.

In the diagnostic coronary angiogram only cohort, the main measure of radiation exposure, dose area product (DAP), was significantly 20.3% higher in the transradial compared with the transfemoral approach group. Junior cardiology fellows meaningfully participate during diagnostic procedures, and, therefore, a sensitivity analysis was performed excluding cases with a junior fellow present. Although median DAP decreased by 3.9% in the transradial and 0.6% in the transfemoral approach group, radiation exposure still remained significantly higher with transradial approach when the analysis was limited to procedures performed by very experienced operators without a junior cardiology fellow present.


In the PCI cohort, the majority were elective cases undergoing ad-hoc PCI with very low complication rates in both groups. Although lesion and procedural characteristics were well-balanced between the transradial and transfemoral approach groups, DAP was significantly 27.6% higher in the transradial compared with transfemoral approach groups.


Although this is a retrospective analysis of a single centre experience, we demonstrate that even in the hands of experienced operators, the radiation exposure still remains higher when using transradial approach compared with transfemoral approach. This study is also one of the few large cohorts to focus on a group of experienced operators and measure DAP, a better estimate of patient radiation dose than fluoroscopy time, as the primary outcome of interest. While transradial procedures may have other advantages (reduced access site complications/bleeding), the amount of radiation administered should also be considered with this approach.

Binita Shah is an interventional cardiologist, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA

Add New Comment

Most popular

Long-term results of RESPECT indicate that PFO closure may be effective at preventing recurrent stroke
Friday, 16 Oct 2015
The long-term study results from the RESPECT trial found that closing a patent foramen ovale (PFO) with an Amplatzer PFO Occluder was superior to medical management in the prevention of recurrent ... Long-term results of RESPECT indicate that PFO closure may be effective at preventing recurrent stroke

Custom-designed vascular training model now available at events
Thursday, 05 Nov 2015
The ThinkRadial Vascular Training Model provides realistic simulation to several procedurally critical vascular destinations, while allowing the practitioner to “see” the way radial products perform ... Custom-designed vascular training model now available at events

Medical titles are “hierarchical” and “hardly appropriate” for person-centred care
Thursday, 26 Nov 2015
In a comment piece in the British Medical Journal, Ashley Graham Kennedy argues that title “doctor” is hierarchical because it suggests that a patient is lesser than and, should defer to, a physician. Medical titles are “hierarchical” and “hardly appropriate” for person-centred care


Helping Little Hearts to mend
Friday, 27 Nov 2015
Nurun Nahar Fatema talks about how Muntada Aid’s Little Hearts campaign has helped children in Bangladesh with congenital heart problems. Helping Little Hearts to mend

An interventional cardiologist’s view on left atrial appendage closure
Thursday, 12 Nov 2015
Martin W Bergmann is an interventional cardiologist working in Germany, who performs percutaneous LAA closure procedures. He explores why there is still a need for such procedures even in the era of ... An interventional cardiologist’s view on left atrial appendage closure


Corrado Tamburino
Tuesday, 20 Oct 2015
Corrado Tamburino (full professor of Cardiology, Ferrarotto & Policlinico Hospitals, University of C... Corrado Tamburino

Javier Escaned
Wednesday, 02 Sep 2015
Javier Escaned (head of Section, Interventional Cardiology Unit, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, M... Javier Escaned

Cardiac Rhythm News Vascular News Cardiovascular News Interventional News Spinal News NeuroNews
BIBA Medical BIBA MedTech Insights CX Symposium ilegx
Password Reminder

BIBA Medical, 526 Fulham Road, Fulham, London, SW6 5NR.
TEL: +44 (0)20 7736 8788 FAX: +44 (0)20 7736 8283 EMAIL: 
© BIBA Medical Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 2944429.
VAT registration number 730 6811 50.
Site Map | Terms and Conditions