login
Password reminder
Cardiac Rhythm News
Contact the editor Visit Cardiac Rhythm News Twitter feed Visit Cardiac Rhythm News Facebook page
 

An inside view into the FAST trial


Wednesday, 08 Feb 2012 12:00
Manuel Castella
Manuel Castella


By Manuel Castella


Since time that the FAST trial1 was designed in 2007, up to now, there has not been clear evidence to indicate ablation treatments aside from the control of symptoms.2,3 Nevertheless, catheter ablation has expanded its indications thanks to increasing evidence that it is significantly more effective at maintaining sinus rhythm than drug therapy. The expanded indication of catheter ablation has been reflected in the 2011 ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines.3


Although catheter ablation has become a routine treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation, two questions arise. First, what is the efficacy to indicate this therapy in patients with left atrium dilatation or with a previous failed catheter ablation? In the FAST trial, two centres with great experience in catheter ablation showed poor results in this subgroup of patients, with 36% actual freedom of arrhythmia at one year.


Thoracoscopic surgery applies the same principles that are applied to catheter ablation to treat atrial fibrillation. Its main difference is that radiofrequency is applied through a bipolar clamp that produces a linear, transmural lesion at the antrum of the pulmonary veins. This avoids most of the dangerous complications in catheter ablation, such as oesophagus lesions or pulmonary vein stenosis. Other lines can be preformed to resemble the Cox-Maze lesion set, but these are made with monopolar radiofrequency; therefore, the possibility of gaps in the line or lack of transmurality exists as in catheter ablation.


Complications in patients in the surgical branch were high in the FAST trial. Interestingly, most of them were due to the essence of it being a new surgical procedure rather than to the technology applied, and therefore a certain learning curve must be appointed.


The agreement by the principal investigators were to start randomising patients after 10 surgeries and, indeed, our first randomised patient in Barcelona was our 11th case. But learning curves are not only about technique. Our anticoagulation protocol started on the third day after surgery. When a patient developed a haemianopsia due to an occipital ischaemic stroke at postoperative day three, we decided to anticoagulate six hours after surgery, and soon after a patient developed an important haemothorax. Our protocol changed to oral anticoagulation at postop day two and after that, we had no more haemorrhagic or ischaemic episodes in more than 50 patients. We are still in a learning process, like catheter ablation was several years ago, when in 2005 the worldwide survey presented a major complications rate of 5%.4


The second question not yet solved is the long-term efficacy of ablation therapy. A recent report with five-year follow-up by the Haissaguerre group has revealed that arrhythmia-free survival rates reaches 29% after a single catheter ablation procedure, and 63% with a mean of two procedures per patient.5 These are discouraging results for such invasive and expensive therapies. Still, we need to know what will be the long-term results with the more consisting surgery-produced ablation lines.


In our opinion and with the actual scientific evidence in hand, most patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to antiarrhythmic therapy should undergo catheter ablation. But after one catheter ablation failure or with left atrium dilatation over 43mm to 45mm, patients would most probably benefit better by thoracoscopic surgery.


Manuel Castella, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain, was a principal investigator in the FAST trial.


References

1. Boersma et al. Circulation 2011. In press

2. Calkins et al. Europace 2007; 9:335–79

3. Wann et al. Circulation 2011; 123:104–23

4. Cappato et al. Circulation 2005;111:1100–05

5. Weerasooriya et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 160–66




Add New Comment

Most popular


New ultrasound-based system shows promise mapping atrial fibrillation
Wednesday, 06 Jan 2016
Initial findings have shown that a new ultrasound-based imaging system with continuous dipole density mapping provides real-time rapid global left atrial reconstruction and compares favourably to ... New ultrasound-based system shows promise mapping atrial fibrillation

Implantation of multiple leadless pacemakers is feasible without impacting cardiac function
Friday, 05 Feb 2016
An animal study from China has indicated that it is feasible to implant two leadless pacemakers in the right ventricle of the same heart without impacting cardiac function at six months. Implantation of multiple leadless pacemakers is feasible without impacting cardiac function

Abbott acquires Kalila Medical
Wednesday, 03 Feb 2016
Kalila Medical has a novel steerable sheath that is designed to help physicians more easily access and perform catheter-based electrophysiology procedures. Abbott acquires Kalila Medical

Features


Has leadless pacing changed practice?
Monday, 18 Jan 2016
Chu-Pak Lau explores the development and use of externally-powered and entirely intracardiac leadless pacemakers, and considers the effect they have had on clinical practice. Has leadless pacing changed practice?

In the absence of testing, ICD optimisation should always be done
Friday, 08 Jan 2016
Mark W Kroll (Minneapolis, USA) writes about the importance of optimisation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the absence of defibrillation threshold testing. In the absence of testing, ICD optimisation should always be done

Profiles


Jonathan Kalman
Monday, 18 Jan 2016
A leading heart rhythm expert in Australia, Jonathan M Kalman directs both clinical and research ... Jonathan Kalman

Michael Glikson
Wednesday, 14 Oct 2015
Michael Glikson (Tel Hashomer, Israel) has contributed to the development of technologies for CRT, ... Michael Glikson

Cardiac Rhythm News Vascular News Cardiovascular News Interventional News Spinal News NeuroNews
BIBA Medical BIBA MedTech Insights CX Symposium ilegx
Password Reminder

BIBA Medical, 526 Fulham Road, Fulham, London, SW6 5NR.
TEL: +44 (0)20 7736 8788 FAX: +44 (0)20 7736 8283 EMAIL: 
info@bibamedical.com
© BIBA Medical Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 2944429.
VAT registration number 730 6811 50.
Site Map | Terms and Conditions