login
  Password reminder
Spinal News
Contact the editor Visit Spinal News Twitter feed Visit Spinal News Facebook page
 

Radiation exposure in scoliosis surgery – Is it a concern?


Friday, 04 May 2012 13:37
Nicholas McArthur
Nicholas McArthur


A small study, presented at Britspine (2–4 May 2012, Newcastle, UK), has found that the level of intraoperative radiation is low during scoliosis surgery.

 


Nicholas McArthur and John Crawford, Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Departments, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK, designed a study to assess radiation exposure of both patients and surgeons in scoliosis surgery. Very few publications have dealt with this matter so far.


Study presenter McArthur said that it was a prospective study that took place over a six-month period and involved 30 consecutive paediatric patients undergoing scoliosis surgery (with two surgeons, John Crawford [JC]and David Conlan [DC; also at Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK], operating on each case). The mean age of patients was 14 years, mean surgical time was 277 minutes, and the mean number of implants was 16. There were three variables used to assess radiation exposure in the patient: screening time, dose area product, and the Monte Carlo calculation. He said: “The Monte Carlo calculation gives an accurate estimate of the radiation exposure that patients sustain by using a number of variables, which also include the dose area product, the patient’s age and their body mass index.” Radiation exposure in the surgeons was assessed with dosimeters on the hands and thyroid.


McArthur
et al found that for patients, the average dose area product reading, per procedure, was 91.3cGycm2, the average screening time was less than half a minute, and the average radiation exposure was 252.9μSv. They also found that with surgeons, after six months, the estimated eye dose of radiation was slightly lower (23.3–38μSv) than the estimated thyroid dose of radiation (36–42μSv). McArthur explained that they were not able to get a radiation reading from the surgeons’ hands because it was so low.


McArthur reported the C-arm’s X-ray tube was positioned next to surgeon JC in 13 patients and next to surgeon DC in the remaining 17 patients. He explained that if you were standing next to the X-ray tube, the average radiation exposure per procedure was 2.07μSv. If you were standing on the C-arm’s screen side, you would be better off as the average radiation exposure per procedure was 0.53μSv. McArthur said: "Now in six months, that would have made a difference of 62μSv vs. 16μSv.”


Overall, each year the surgeon’s risk of cancer would increase by 0.0005% by performing surgery on 60 cases of scoliosis per year. He said: “For the patient, who was undergoing surgery only once, the risk of cancer was 0.001%.”


McArthur added: “We estimated the total body radiation exposure at 130μSv per year. That is less than 1% of the whole body limit for these staff members (ie, surgeons). It is approximately equivalent to 21 days’ exposure to background radiation in the UK. Of course, we need to consider other sources of radiation.”


The study’s conclusion, McArthur reported, was that the overall dose of radiation was “quite low”. He added: “If there are two surgeons operating at the same time, consider swapping sides. If operating alone, be on the opposite side of the X-ray tube.”




Add New Comment

Most popular


New device allows brain to bypass spinal cord and move paralysed limbs
Friday, 27 Jun 2014
For the first time ever, a paralysed man has moved his fingers and hand with his own thoughts after an electronic neural bypass for spinal cord injuries that reconnects the brain directly to muscles, ... New device allows brain to bypass spinal cord and move paralysed limbs

Tantalum porous implant is a good alternative to plate and autograft in ACDF
Friday, 13 Jun 2014
A new study indicates that patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a tantalum implant have fewer complications and reduced costs at five years compared with patients ... Tantalum porous implant is a good alternative to plate and autograft in ACDF

Level of cervical surgery does not affect postoperative headache relief
Friday, 30 May 2014
A study in the Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine indicates that although patients with cervical spondylolysis at higher levels have significantly greater preoperative headache pain than patients with ... Level of cervical surgery does not affect postoperative headache relief

Features


Can cognitive behavioural therapy help spinal surgery patients return to work and daily life?
Friday, 11 Jul 2014
Nanna Rolving and colleagues have launched a study to investigate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using a multidisciplinary cognitive behavioural intervention to help patients ... Can cognitive behavioural therapy help spinal surgery patients return to work and daily life?

Reducing the need for allogeneic blood transfusions in metastatic spine tumour surgery
Tuesday, 24 Jun 2014
At BritSpine (2–4 April, Warwick, UK), Naresh Kumar presented the results of a systematic review of using intraoperative salvaged blood in metastatic spine tumour surgery to reduce the need for ... Reducing the need for allogeneic blood transfusions in metastatic spine tumour surgery

Profiles


Luiz Pimenta
Thursday, 12 Jun 2014
Luiz Pimenta, immediate past president of the International Society for the Advancement of Spinal S... Luiz Pimenta

Frank Schwab
Thursday, 17 Apr 2014
Frank Schwab (chief of the Spinal Deformity Service, Division of Spine Surgery, New York University,... Frank Schwab

Cardiac Rhythm News Vascular News Cardiovascular News Interventional News Spinal News NeuroNews
BIBA Medical BIBA MedTech Insights CX Symposium ilegx
 
Password Reminder

BIBA Medical, 526 Fulham Road, Fulham, London, SW6 5NR.
TEL: +44 (0)20 7736 8788 FAX: +44 (0)20 7736 8283 EMAIL: 
info@bibamedical.com
© BIBA Medical Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 2944429.
VAT registration number 730 6811 50.
Site Map | Terms and Conditions